Your Paper, The Right Path. Every thing must be made as easy as possible, yet not easier.

Your Paper, The Right Path. Every thing must be made as easy as possible, yet not easier.

– Caused By Albert Einstein


Prezi for more information on Your Paper, the right path

A plea that is recurring scientists is oftentimes to simplify the entire process of planning and publishing documents. With every journal having various technical and formatting needs and lots of documents being submitted more often than once before book, authors think it is onerous to need to invest time that is valuable in the place of engaging utilizing the more effective areas of research. In reality, nearly one out of three scientists suggested “preparing manuscripts” when asked what work tasks they found many irritating or time-consuming, in a study performed by Elsevier’s analysis and Academic Relations department in 2012.

With all the goal of making the distribution process easier, the Elsevier log, complimentary revolutionary Biology and Medicine launched Your Paper, Your Way (YPYW) last year. YPYW is a less strenuous submission procedure, concentrating on the quality of the technology when you look at the initial phases of distribution and just elements that are requiring for ultimate manufacturing during the modification phase. If documents are refused, this easier distribution procedure saves authors commitment and in addition, might help them attain quicker book rates.

YPYW has been extended to a huge selection of Elsevier journals. Every log which provides YPYW plainly suggests this at the start of its guide for writers, as follows:

” We currently differentiate involving the demands for brand new and revised submissions. You could elect to submit your manuscript as a solitary word or pdf file to be utilized within the refereeing procedure. Only if your paper has reached the revision stage, are you required to place your paper as a ‘correct structure’ for acceptance and supply the things necessary for the book of one’s article.”

Your Paper, Your Path demands

  • Authors may submit their manuscript (text, numbers and tables) as being a file that is single. This is A term or PDF file, in virtually any structure or design, and numbers and tables may be put in the text.
  • Numbers must certanly be of high sufficient quality for refereeing.
  • There aren’t any strict formatting needs but all manuscripts must retain the crucial elements needed to evaluate a manuscript (Abstract, keyword phrases, Introduction, components & practices, Results, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions).
  • Sources may be in just about any style or format, as long because the style is consistent. Author(s) name(s), journal title/book name, article name (where needed), 12 months of book, amount & problem /book chapter therefore the pagination must certanly be current. Usage of DOI is very motivated. The reference design employed by the log shall be reproduced to your accepted article by Elsevier during the evidence stage.
  • Whenever the revision is reached by a paper stage, writers would be required to supply any items which essay writer will always be necessary for book, as an example editable source files.

Reactions to YPYW

YPYW was absolutely gotten by writers. In a study delivered by Elsevier’s Research and Academic Relations department to writers who’d chosen YPYW whenever publishing their manuscript, associated with 3,958 writers surveyed, 70% reacted definitely whenever asked, “Did Your Paper, the right path decrease the period of time it often takes to format and submit the manuscript?” Commentary received from surveyed writers included:

. time-consuming work that is formatting maybe perhaps perhaps not undertaken needlessly.

I did not need to spend time with formatting before being certain in regards to the acceptance.

It had been easier and faster than [the] traditional one. I do believe it really is a way that is good speed the procedure.

92% of writers surveyed found YPYW effortless or excessively simple, in comparison to 61per cent of writers whom utilized the traditional procedure.

To gauge the effect on reviewers, 870 responses from Elsevier’s current Reviewer Feedback Programme (RFP) were analyzed, of which 346 pertaining to a YPYW submission. There have been no significant variations in reviewer satisfaction. Some reviewers have actually complimented the modification since it makes their life more straightforward to look at the numbers and tables inside the text, instead of at the conclusion of this manuscript as is usually needed.

Further reading

“Your Paper, Your Way”, Kelvin J A Davies, PhD, DSc, Editor-in-Chief, Complimentary Revolutionary Biology & Medicine

“Your Paper, your path plus the reviewing procedure”, Catriona Fennell, Rebecca Barrie


您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注